Answer:
The option which weaken the conclusion drawn is:
E. All artists who receive grants and donations are completely dependent on that money to cover their daily expenses; without those funds, they would have to discontinue the practice of their art.
Explanation:
The conclusion drawn in the passage is that grants and donations are a bad things because they actually make artists lose the interest for work. The passage claims that artists only practice art because they need to survive.
<u>The option that weakens that conclusion is the one that goes against it. In that case, we should choose letter E, since it claims the opposite. It states that artists need the money they receive in the form of grants and donations. If they cannot cover their expenses, they cannot work. If grants and donations help them cove their expenses, they are able to work. Therefore, letter E is the best option.</u>
Answer:
It is called the bill of rights.
Explanation:
Answer:
The principle of equality
Explanation:
Although this question does not have the group of answer choices, this is the definition of the principle of equality.
In sociology, the principle of equality refers to the fact that <u>all people should be treated as equals</u> and that all the interests of all people are equally important regardless of characteristics such as gender, age, sexual orientation, social class. Therefore, <u>it would be unjust to treat people differently unless we can show that there is actually a difference between them that is relevant to actually treat them in a different way. </u>
<u />