Article One of the Constitution illustrates how the national goverment's power is (4 points)

Law

1 answer:

Anuta_ua [19.1K]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

a) derived from the states and the people

Explanation:

History class

You might be interested in

Disorderly conduct is a misdemeanor that can be punished by up to

ankoles [38]

I think d is the correct answer hope this helps

7 0

1 year ago

Why do you think the authors of the Fourth Amendment required law enforcement officers to establish probable cause before making

castortr0y [4]

Fourth Amendment Law Enforcement explained below:

The Fourth Amendment permits the right to be free from non-reasonable searches by the government.
The government should complete an analysis of the commitment of crime that had taken place before the search warrant to be given.
They also have permission to search the area whether the area has done any illegal things.
The government is much more careful in protecting the law right to liberty and they are so consciousness in not disturbing the normal people.

4 0

3 years ago

Do you think all criminal cases should be heard by professionals and paid judges instead? Would this be better? Why?

KIM [24]

$\large{\underline{\underline{\pmb{\sf{\color{yellow}{Answer:}}}}}}$

No criminal crime should not be heard judges other than professional and paid judges because they have a lot of experience about these kinds of cases

5 0

2 years ago

The judicial branch has the responsibility to:

pogonyaev

Answer:

review laws, explain laws and then decides if the laws in question go against the constitution

Explanation:

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What is Katz argument? What is the Katz v United States holding ?

gregori [183]

What is Katz argument: The Court ruled that Katz was entitled to Fourth Amendment protection for his conversations and that a physical intrusion into the area he occupied was unnecessary to bring the Amendment into play. "The Fourth Amendment protects people, not places," wrote Justice Potter Stewart for the Court.

What is the Katz v United States holding: The Court ruled that Katz was entitled to Fourth Amendment protection for his conversations and that a physical intrusion into the area he occupied was unnecessary to bring the Amendment into play. "The Fourth Amendment protects people, not places," wrote Justice Potter Stewart for the Court.

3 0

2 years ago