c. Resistant bacteria have survived and reproduced at a greater rate than nonresistant bacteria
Explanation:
The antibiotic is no longer effective as it was 20 years ago because the resistant bacterial have survived and reproduced at a greater rate than the non-resistant bacteria.
- The antibiotics have specifically designed to exterminate the disease causing bacteria strain from the body.
- While at that point in time, it is potent and does the work. Along the line, it will cause the structures of some other strains to change.
- This will lead to the development of resistant breeds with time.
- The resistant breed will then be able to survive the onslaught of the antibiotics making it not a good fit.
Learn more:
Selective force brainly.com/question/4602376
#learnwithBrainly
The answer is transport vesicles
One major reason for exploring extreme environments is to find new resources. An example of a resource is the search for a new antibiotic. Extreme environments have rare species endemic to the regions which can offer different insights from the normative environment we are used to.
No, I would not. This is because the risk of death is higher in an extreme environment. Example of these risks are deadly diseases or harsh climate. The body may be unable to adjust to the extreme environment hence may be unable to restore homoeostasis; such as in restoring body heat in extremely cold environments hence leading to hypothermia.
I assume the answer is man-made, correct?
Smoking has been statistically identified as a <em><u>causative</u></em> element in the development of cancers of the lung, tongue, esophagus, and stomach.
It's certainly not a <em>prevention</em> in any way.
