Answer:
$1,000
Explanation:
No fault insurance basically protects you and your family from small accidents by paying your medical bills regardless of who is at fault. This type of policies applies to car or house insurance.
In this case, the accident was caused by Jason but since who is responsible is not important in this type of policy, then it should cover up to its maximum limit.
Answer:
2.27%
; 61.54%
Explanation:
Given that,
Sales/Total assets = 2.2x
Return on assets (ROA) = 5%
Return on equity (ROE) = 13%
Therefore,
Return on assets = Profit margin × Assets turnover
0.05 = Profit margin × 2.2
Profit margin = 0.05 ÷ 2.2
Profit margin = 0.0227 or 2.27%
Percent of total assets is from equity:
= Return on assets ÷ Return on equity
= 0.05 ÷ 0.13
= 0.3846 or 38.46%
Hence, the debt is as follows:
Debt = Assets - equity
= 1 - 0.3846
= 0.6154 or 61.54%
First, we add up all the benefits that Gerome Houser gets from his job. That is,
$1,755 + $3,898 + $2,898 +$2,098 +$1,404 = $12,053
Then, we divide this amount by his annual salary and multiply the quotient by 100% to get the answer.
($12,053 / $45,623) x 100% = 26.4%
Therefore, Gerome Houser's rate of benefits is approximately 26.4%.
Answer:
False
Explanation:
Marketing research is a term that is used to refer to the process of systematically designing, collecting, interpreting, and reporting information. It is used to help marketers solve specific marketing problems, and it is also used to take advantage of market opportunities. Marketing research is used to gather information which are not currently available to the decision makers.
A marketing information system (MIS) refers to a system in which marketing data is formally gathered, stored, analysed and distributed to managers in accordance with their informational needs on a regular basis. A management information system is systematically designed to support marketing decision making.
Answer:
Res ipsa loquitur
Explanation:
_____ is a tort in which the presumption of negligence arises because the defendant was in exclusive control of the situation, and the plaintiff would not have suffered injury but for someone's negligence.
Res ipsa loquitur is a doctrine in law that one can presume the negligence of a defendant when the facts are glaring.The doctrine has primarily required that a defendant have exclusive power over the occurrence of an injury. negligence could result from
1. an actual causal connection between the defendant's conduct and the resulting harm; 2 a duty of care owed by the defendant to the plaintiff; 3 a breach of that duty;
