Topography climate or districts
I would say that it is the third one.
Well, before you start, you need to choose a side. If you are confused on the phrasing, it is simply asking:
Do you agree that the Supreme Court should be able to think of the law differently during a case to fit with current views?
After that, start thinking of why.
Yes, they should, the Founding Fathers wrote the Constitution to change as societal views changed.
No, they shouldn't, just because societal views are changing, what we need for our country to run smoothly is the same as it has been,
Hope I could help!
<span>Moral Motivation.</span>
In our regular day to day existences, we stand up to a large
group of good issues. Once we have deliberated and formed judgments about what
is right or wrong, good or bad, these judgments tend to have a marked hold on us. In spite
of the fact that at last, we don't generally carry on as we think we should,
our ethical judgments ordinarily inspire us. Moral motivation is an instance of
a more general phenomenon—what we might call normative
motivation—for our other normative judgments also typically have some
motivating force.
This is most likely because of the ease when making judicial rulings. If there is an odd number of judges, then there will rarely be a tie vote. This can only occur when judges decide to abstain from voting. Most likely, the current court has an odd number of Justices to prevent an evenly split decision.
