Answer:
The proportion of people in your sample whose response is yes=40 people
Explanation:
<em>Step 1: Determine the statistical proportion that will say yes</em>
Proportion=40%=40/100=0.4
<em>Step 2: Determine the proportion in the sample that will say yes</em>
The proportion in the sample can be expressed as;
P=S×Z
where;
P=proportion in the sample
S=statistical proportion
Z=sample size
In our case;
P=unknown to be determined
S=40%=40/100=0.4
Z=100
replacing;
Proportion in the sample=0.4×100=40
The proportion of people in your sample whose response is yes=40 people
Answer:
The answer is Balance sheet accounts are overstated and income statement accounts are understated.
Explanation:
Highest growth rate based on GDP rate is found in Japan. This has been an ongoing trend for the last 100 years.
Answer:
d. One defect of the IRR method versus the NPV is that the IRR does not take proper account of differences in the sizes of projects.
CORRECT As the project yields over time can differ. This generates that projects with a lower IRR can achieve a higher NPV at lower rates.
There is a crossover point after which a projects NPV are equal and from there the one with higher IRR obtains better NPV
Explanation:
a. One defect of the IRR method versus the NPV is that the IRR does not take account of the time value of money.
FALSE both method consider time value of money
b. One defect of the IRR method versus the NPV is that the IRR does not take account of the cost of capital
FALSE The IRR can be compared against the cost of capital to indicate wether or not a project should be preferable
.c. One defect of the IRR method versus the NPV is that the IRR values a dollar received today the same as a dollar that will not be received until sometime in the future.
FALSE IRR considers the time value of money
e. One defect of the IRR method versus the NPV is that the IRR does not take account of cash flows over a project's full life.
FALSE it considers all the cash flows over the project's full life.
Answer:
By 186% the price of a dozen eggs rise.
Explanation:
Given that,
Cost in December 2000 = $0.96
Cost in December 2015 = $2.75
Average wage for December 2000 = $14.28 per hour
Average wage for December 2015 = $21.26
By considering these information, we are able to calculate the increase price percentage of a dozen eggs. The calculation is shown below:
= (December 2015 price - December 2000 price ) ÷ (December 2000 price) × 100
= ($2.75 - $0.96) ÷ ($0.96) × 100
= ($1.79) ÷ ($0.96) × 100
= 186%
Thus, by 186% the price of a dozen eggs rise.
