Answer:
Schizotypal personality disorder
Explanation:
The term "schizotypal" is simply defined as the act of social discomfort and a state of limited ability to have a good or close relationships along with distinct/peculiar thinking and behavior that is odd and eccentric thinking.
Schizotypal Personality Disorder is a disorder that is known to have a potent pattern of social and interpersonal disadvantage and a limited ability/capability for close relationships.
Individuals with this disorder are known to have odd, perceptual,cognitive distortions and eccentric behavior. This odd beliefs and eccentric behavior include noticing flashes of red light that nobody else sees, believing that they can read other peoples thoughts etc.
Answer:
B. at or higher than the global average
Explanation:
The development rebate is calculated by measuring the total economic output that each countries managed to produce within a one year period. A country will be considered to be developing if it experienced an increase in economic output.
According to the data from world bank, the average for global development rate is 2.9% per year. The average for Latin America's development rate is around 4% per year.
You must 1. pass a test about US history and 2. speak, read, and write US English
I would say D. Although Kansas was a Free State for African Americans and life would be easier and cheaper for them, I don’t see that as an option. All the others just don’t make plain sense.
Answer:
Reapportionment after each census is important because the population of a state or district may shift. If enough population shifts occur, representation in that district and surrounding districts may no longer be fair and legal without reapportionment. In 1962, the United States Supreme Court heard a case called Baker v. Carr about reapportionment. Usually, House of Representative districts are a state issue, and the national government, including the Supreme Court, may not interfere. However, Charles Baker, a mayor in Tennessee, sued Tennessee Secretary of State Joe Carr because Tennessee had not redistricted or reapportioned in more than 50 years. In 1900, the population of urban Memphis, Tenn., was roughly equal to the rural district nearby, and it made sense that each district had one vote. However, by 1960, when Baker was mayor, the population had shifted, and though the urban population of Memphis was more than 10 times the rural district nearby, each area still had only one vote. Since Tennessee had not reapportioned its state voting on its own, Baker sued to bring the federal government into the dispute. The Supreme Court found that although it usually had no power in state apportionment issues, in this case it did, because the state had acted unfairly and had not treated each citizen the same. The Court found that the votes of the rural citizens were counting more than the votes of the urban citizens, and the state of Tennessee was forced to redistrict.