Answer:
No, the court would not have been so lenient with her.
Explanation:
Whether or not Carmela was passive in the situation or she was only guiding her father on how to go about the lawsuit, the court has every right and would have included her in the lawsuit with her father. This is so because her father and she would have been included in the lawsuit in default. Hence, it is not a matter of decency or not, but a matter of what is supposed to be.
The correct answer would be wrong or misleading advertising. Laws that implemented the consumer's right to be informed forbid false advertising. Black propagandas are often used by businesses who wants to convince consumers to buy their products in a very exaggerated way.
Answer:
Phineas Gage has a rod driven into his skull by accident which resulted in brain injury. The rod was known to pass through and destroyed his frontal lobes.
He would have benefited well if several treatment and plans were given such as psychosocial support after the damage to his cerebrum. He would have also benefited well from vocational rehabilitation intervention. They would have helped a lot on his recovery from the accident.
The right answer is C. attention, need, satisfaction, visualization, action. This is a sequence created by Alan Monroe in 1930 when he was working at Purdue University. This is a technical sequence created for the creation and planning of persuasive speeches that aim to inspire people to act. The sequence of steps indicates that you must first achieve the attention of the people, establish the problem to finally invite action.
I hope my answer can help you.
This is false!
Attitude does not have anything to do with effectiveness: it can relate to everything. One can have an attitude towards everything: other people, ideas, places, it basically means an opinion about something, a way of thinking about something.
