Answer:
Explicit costs - $51,000
Explicit costs are those for which a person incurs in actual spending of money. In this case, Christine had to pay $15,000 in wages, and $36,000 in rent ($3,000 x 12). These are expenses that she had to pay money for, and that had to be accounted for in the accounting books, and in the financial statements. These are in other words, explicit costs.
Implicit costs - $40,000
Implicit costs are simply the opportunity costs. An opportunity cost is the cost of the next more valuable alternative when faced with two or more options. No money is paid for this costs. The implicit costs for Christine were the $40,000 that she not receive as wages if she had continued working at a real state firm.
Answer:
$61,175
Explanation:
Base on the scenario been described in the question, we expected to solve for the future worth
The table of the cash flow is shows in the picture
We can find that by calculating the Future worth
Future Worth = {2,500 + 1,500(P/A 7%,10) 100 + (P/G 7%,10) } [F/P 7%, 20]
Future worth = { 2,500 + 1500(7.024) + 100(27.716)}
Future worth = $61,175
Answer:
EEOC
Explanation:
The staff probably work for Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), an agency designed to analyse the implementation of federals laws. The agency is liable to visit corporations to investigate the discrepancies, and to ensure that the laws are implemented. They enforced the laws, and investigate the complains of the general public regarding employment discrimination.
Answer:
social environment
Explanation:
The activities performed as mentioned in the problem is termed as employee engagement activities. Reason behind doing this to increase social interaction which generates understanding between employee. it strengthen social and emotional connection of people and hence employee feel more satisfied towards their work and organization. This is done via increases healthy social engagement and hence social environment is correct answer
