Based on the results of the study, the conclusion which is valid is There is correlation between the increase in the rate of televised political attack ads since the previous congressional election and the rate of voter dissatisfaction in the observed districts.
<h3>What doe
s the study conclude?</h3>
The study showed that the rate of voter dissatisfaction in the districts since the previous election cycles is similar to the rate of increase of televised political attack ads.
The fact that both the rate of voter dissatisfaction and televised political attack ads moved together means that they correlate with each other.
It is important to note however, that correlation does not equate causation so there might be no link between the two rates.
Find out more on correlation at brainly.com/question/26998752
#SPJ1
Answer:
2=13
4=21
8=37
10=45
Bc all you are doing is replacing the x with the # to the left.
Answer:
Part 1) An equation is 15.7=3p+1
Part 2) The approximate population in 1950 was 4.9 million people
Step-by-step explanation:
Let
p -----> the population in 1950 in million people
y -----> the population in 2003 in million people
we know that
y=3p+1 -----> equation A
y=15.7 ----> equation B
substitute equation B in equation A and solve for x
15.7=3p+1
3p=15.7-1
3p=14.7
p=4.9
therefore
The approximate population in 1950 was 4.9 million people
Step-by-step explanation:
24÷2[70÷5{4+(12-(12-8÷6×3))}]
12[14{4+(12-(12-4))}]
12[14{4+(12-8)}]
12[14{4+4}]
12[14{8}]
12[112]
1344
