Based on the given excerpt, the most logical answer would be C. "To respond to the counterclaim that veganism is bad for the environment."
The information cited clearly shows that the writer is against the consumption of meat. Choices A and D are more like personal attacks on those of the opposing side of the issue, which is inappropriate during an argumentative essay. Choice B is also invalid since the statistics provided don't mention anything related to an individual's personal health.
The correct answer for the question that is being presented above is this one: (1) he upheld the general use of nonviolent civil disobeyed against unjust laws and (2) saying human rights must take precedence over such laws. If King admits that breaking laws in order to change them is "a legitimate concern," then here are the two reasons for his defense of civil disobedience (1) h<span>e upheld the general use of nonviolent civil disobeyed against unjust laws and (2) saying human rights must take precedence over such laws.</span>
Okay, so this is a little hard to answer when you do not have the excerpts, but I will try my best to work a answer out of the headings. I think your answer would be C. It makes sense, the info that comes after the titles, so If I were you I would go with C.
I hope that helps.
Explanation:
<h2>jdjbdbdbxbdhdhddhjejejs
bye</h2>
He used to live in France as a boy .
There used to be trees in the garden. They used to come out in those days . I used to love her . How did you used to spend your winter evenings?
