Answer:
Letter B is correct. <u>Narrowing the gap between theory and practice.</u>
Explanation:
Case study is an investigative methodological approach applied to simple or applied social sciences. It is carried out through the use of different qualitative methods for the collection of data and information relevant to the foundation of the research. The qualitative method is the most appropriate in a case study, as it occurs through subjective and not substantially statistical means of in-depth analysis of relevant factors in an event, an individual, an institution, a group and others.
Case studies can be classified as:
- exploratory,
- descriptive, or
- explanatory.
So it is correct to state that the purpose of the case study is to reduce the difference between theory and practice. Because the analysis of the information collected and the variables and patterns found will provide subsidies for the discussion and better understanding and reasoning between what happens between the theory and the practice analyzed in the case study.
Answer:
6.37%
Explanation:
Annual yield is the annual dividend yield of a bond.
Formula for annual yield = Annual dividend amount / Current price of the bond
Annual dividend amount = Annual interest rate * Face value
= 6% * $5,000
= <u><em>$300</em></u>
Current price = 94.125 means that the bond price is 94.125% of the Face value
Current price = 0.94125* 5000 = <u><em>$4,706.25</em></u>
Therefore, annual yield = 300/4,706.25 = 0.0637 or 6.37%
Answer:
The correct answer is a. production points outside the production possibility frontier are unattainable
Explanation:
Production possibility frontier graph is attached.
The production possibility frontier shows the possibilities of trade off between two products. The trade off in this frontier use all the resources available. So it is impossible to reach a point outside the frontier, there are not enough resources.
It doesn't require any skills or special talent to flip burgers.
Hope this helps! :-)
Answer:
B
Explanation:
One of the problems in economics is the allocation of goods in the presence of externalities. When externalities are present allocation of goods in private market won't be efficient because private parties won't internalize them and would arrive to an inefficient outcome. For many years this was an argument in favor of government intervention.
However, Ronald Coase showed that assigning property rights of the externality to one of the private parties (no matter which one) would result in an efficient outcome. This is because the parties with the property right would then internalize the cost. Then in the bargaining process private parties would reach an efficient outcome without the intervention of the government.
