1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
disa [49]
3 years ago
6

What did Western democracies do in response to the Anschluss [annexation of Czechoslovakia]? What message might this send to hit

ler
Social Studies
1 answer:
sleet_krkn [62]3 years ago
8 0

Answer: The western democracy in reaction to this gave Hitler a land with no casualties, which made him understood that he was invisible and can get whatever he wanted

Explanation:

The annexation of Czechoslovakia took place on March 12, 1938, when German troops invaded Austria to add to themselves the German-speaking nation for the third Reich, they did it twice and forced the Austrian government to unite with Nazi Germany

The western democracy in reaction to this gave Hitler a land with no casualties, which made him understood that he was invisible and can get whatever he wanted

You might be interested in
What is the difference between socialism and communism?
Korolek [52]
The main difference is that under communism, most property and economic resources are owned and controlled by the state (rather than individual citizens); by contrast, under socialism, all citizens share equally in all economic resources as allocated by a democratically-elected government.Mar 21, 2019

4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
1. Which of these was a common reaction by Indians to Europeans and represented a rejection of Chief Johnson's suggestions? (A)
zhannawk [14.2K]

Answer:

Option B: Migrating westward

Explanation:

The European colonialism was common in the 15th to 20th century. The English find a way of taking the people's agricultural land after buying the lands and making the native indians to be alien in their own land. The influence of Colonial rule on the indians is quite obvious. Colonial rule is known to carry orders or decree that are enforce on the people. Migrating westward from their native land was generally faulted by the people. Indians were shocked to know that have given up their hunting and fishing rights, and settlers thought tbat an unqualified sovereignty that Native American culture know not.

3 0
4 years ago
How might an empire oppress the region? How would the empire harm you as a merchant?
Makovka662 [10]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Although there are no options or any specific region or reference included, we can say the following.

An empire can oppress a region in that the Emperor can exert total power and control over the conquered territories and their people. When an empire conquers other nations, the Emperor orders to exploit all the raw materials and natural resources so he can get richer. Many times, subjects had to pay heavy taxation and had no liberties. They had to completely obey the Emperor's demands.

Of course, the empire would harm merchants in that it was the King or the Emperor, who benefited the most with the taxation charged on trade transactions. Or merchants had to pay a specific amount as tribute so merchants could do their work.

7 0
3 years ago
How many workers would producers be willing to employ at a wage of $40 per hour?
skelet666 [1.2K]

The correct answer is 8.

In the labor market, the demand of labor represents the quantity of workers that producers are willing to hire at different wage levels (prices). Therefore, according to the information in the graph, at a wage level of 40 the producers demand 8 workers.

At the same price level, the supply of labor equals 52. This means that there are 52 workers that are willing to offer their labor skills in exchange for a salary of 40$.

Therefore, in this market there is a excess of demand, there are more people willing to work than the job positions offered by producers, so this labor market situation represents an unemployment situation.

8 0
3 years ago
When people are stimulated by an exciting soccer match, their excitement can fuel and intensify anger. this effect is known as:?
Brums [2.3K]
The correct answer is <span>the spillover effect. 

The spillover effect (SOE) refers to the phenomenon in which our emotional responses or reactions to one particular event or situation "spills over" and influences our emotional responses to another event. An instance of SOE, is when you come home from a run and are already feeling good because of endorphins. Next, you receive some good news from a friend, and the good feelings from the run, spill over and make you feel the same about your friend's news. </span>
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is organizational theory and design?
    13·1 answer
  • What are two ways early man adapted to the Ice Age
    8·1 answer
  • In one research study, it was found that mothers of infants respond differently to the crying of irritable girls than the crying
    9·1 answer
  • A word or phrase with a powerful negative connotation used to describe some quality of a person or group is a(n) ________​
    7·1 answer
  • Many Georgians became angry during the Revolutionary War because the Creeks decided to side with the British. took territory awa
    13·2 answers
  • Sociology:
    6·1 answer
  • Social stratification is a concept that refers to ________ specialization in productive work. ranking categories of people in a
    11·1 answer
  • An 1815 volcanic eruption in Indonesia was followed by a three-year famine
    10·1 answer
  • How does discrimination impact a student’s academics?
    6·1 answer
  • A client being treated for syphilis visits the office with a possible allergic reaction to benzathine penicillin g. which abnorm
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!