1. It encourages international cooperation.
- true!
It
leads to peaceful resolutions of international
conflicts. - well, a bit, but only as an extension of the frist thing- so the frist one is a better option!
It protects fragile ecosystems. - nothing to do with that!
It provides jobs for workers
in developed nations. - not, rather in the developing nation
Which is an argument against free trade?
It can limit environmental protection measures. - i don't think this is a very good option, but its the best of those given. Let's say that one country prohibits production which is enviromentally harmful, but cheap: a free trade would challenge this deciosn.
It leads to
international conflict. - no, i don't think so
It increases the prices for many products. -no, it rather decreases
It
violates basic economic principles.
- no, i don't think si
Answer:
Were usually closely contested affairs
Explanation:
The political scenario was notable in that despite a certain level of corruption, turnout was very high and national elections saw two evenly matched parties (Republican and Democratic). The dominant issues were cultural (i.e prohibition, education, and ethnic or racial groups) and economic (tariffs and money supply).
Answer:
Provide for the public good
Provide Services
Resolve Conflict
Maintain Order
Ensure National Security
Explanation:
Hope this helps :)
100 * (2/3) ~ 66.67
Round up, because you need a whole number which is at least 66.67
And your final answer is 67.
