Thet contradict each other, that's why both of them are incorrect.
<span>Suppose that a polynomial has four roots: s, t, u, and v. If the polynomial were evaluated at any of these values, it would have to be zero. Therefore, the polynomial can be written in this form.
p(x)(x - s)(x - t)(x - u)(x - v), where p(x) is some non-zero polynomial
This polynomial has a degree of at least 4. It therefore cannot be cubic.
Now prove Kelsey correct. We have already proved that there can be no more than three roots. To prove that a cubic polynomial with three roots is possible, all we have to do is offer a single example of that. This one will do.
(x - 1)(x - 2)(x - 3)
This is a cubic polynomial with three roots, and four or more roots are not possible for a cubic polynomial. Kelsey is correct.
Incidentally, if this is a roller coaster we are discussing, then a cubic polynomial is not such a good idea, either for a vertical curve or a horizontal curve. I hope this helps</span><span>
</span>
Hi there Maebe, since the ratio is 3:1 your answer is 96.
The ratio 3:1 is just saying Juanita has 3 times whatever Elita has. So, Elita’s 32 times 3 equals 96. :) I hope I’ve helped you. Please give me feedback if you need more help understanding!
If these are diving fractions with these then it is 3 1/2 if they are not fractions then it is 0.22
I hope i helped!
