1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
tatyana61 [14]
3 years ago
6

How did most Cherokee's react to the increasing presence of Americans on their ancestral lands in the early 1800s?

Social Studies
1 answer:
umka2103 [35]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

C. They attempted to practice an American way of life and live in peace with Americans.

Explanation:

With the increase in the immigration of settlers into America, the lands of indigenous people would become more encroached. Native Indians would be forced to defend their ancestral lands and settlements from the white settlers.

When the white settlers begin to gradually increase in the Indians' lands, the Natives, including the Cherokee people would at first try to peacefully welcome them. They silently agreed to let the white settlers among them, even agreeing to 'share' their lands for their 'homes'. They tried to ensure that peace prevails even with the white settlers' intrusion into their 'sacred' and ancestral lands.

Thus, the correct answer is option C.

You might be interested in
Explain what followership means
pshichka [43]
In simple definition followership means:

1. the ability or willingness to follow a leader.
2. a group of followers or supporters; following.


Followership is the actions of someone in a subordinate role. It can also be considered as a specific set of skills that complement leadership, a role within a hierarchical organization, a social construct that is integral to the leadership process, or the behaviors engaged in while interacting with leaders in an effort to meet organizational objectives.[1] As such, followership is best defined as an intentional practice on the part of the subordinate to enhance the synergetic interchange between the follower and the leader.

In organizations, “leadership is not just done by the leader, and followership is not just done by followers.” [2] This perspective suggests that leadership and followership do not operate on one continuum, with one decreasing while the other increases. Rather, each dimension exists as a discrete dimension, albeit with some shared competencies.[3]

The study of followership is an emerging area within the leadership field that helps explain outcomes. Specifically, followers play important individual, relational, and collective roles in organizational failures and successes.[4][5][6] “If leaders are to be credited with setting the vision for the department or organization and inspiring followers to action, then followers need to be credited with the work that is required to make the vision a reality.”[7]

The term follower can be used as a personality type, as a position in a hierarchy, as a role, or as a set of traits and behaviors. Studies of followership have produced various theories including trait, behavioral attributes, role, and constructionist theories in addition to exploring myths or misunderstandings about followership.
7 0
3 years ago
Socrates would argue against himself to poke holes in his own line of reasoning. Why did he think this was important
larisa [96]

Answer:

Sometimes we convince ourselves that we are right and Socrates being an extremely intelligent person might simply come up with an idea and share it to the world and his fellow thinkers, but instead he thought twice and tried to disprove his own idea to see if it really was correct, original and going to be accepted.

3 0
3 years ago
The Boers left Cape Colony to begin what two states?
ahrayia [7]
The Boers left Cape Colony to begin the Orange Free State and Transvaal
5 0
3 years ago
Dyanna is starting to develop more a purposeful and goal-directed approach to set the stage for her motivated self to grow. What
STatiana [176]

Answer: 5 to 7 years old

Explanation: Dyanna is persisting the changes in the nature in the age range of 5 year to 7 years according to the theory of the Erickson .The stages of age in the Erik Erickson's theory is describes the child's behavior and changes that occur in different situation and circumstances. Dyanna is dealing with the goals that she realizes to be her motive of life and with confidence she wants to pursue it.

5 0
3 years ago
Egyptians built pyramids because they
sladkih [1.3K]
I believe the answer is D
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What is the process by which a party selects a single candidate to run for each elective office?
    9·1 answer
  • Welma is unable to accept the fact that she has been diagnosed with lung cancer. She refuses treatment despite her family’s atte
    6·1 answer
  • How did President Truman exercise increased presidential powers while in office?
    12·1 answer
  • The gift tax is used to prevent people from avoiding the
    8·1 answer
  • What impact did the sale of silk have on Roman society?
    11·1 answer
  • Please help ill give brainliest PLEASE HELP
    10·2 answers
  • Which of the following statements represents academic field support for the humanistic perspective?
    12·2 answers
  • Answer the questions thx
    12·2 answers
  • Why didn’t Elizabeth Cady Stanton become a lawyer
    7·1 answer
  • Sexual relations, marriage, and family are all considered by anthropologists as?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!