I also left in sudden ! Let's talk again on my Zo o m ! I am waiting there .
Answer:
Keeping animals in Zoos has long been an issue. However, I think that keeping animals in Zoos is safe and fine because 1. They keep them safe from predators, 2. They are well taken care of, and 3. It prevents them from becoming extinct.
To begin with, I believe that keeping animals in Zoos is safe and okay because Zoos educate the public and create a respect for different species by bringing people and animals together. Poachers, habitat destruction, malnutrition, and predators are all threats to endangered animals, but zoos safeguard them by putting them into a secure setting. This is how animals can be kept safe. In conclusion, I think that Zoos keep animals safe because they are away from predators.
Second, seeing an animal up and personal is a far more intimate and unforgettable experience than seeing it in a nature documentary, and it is more likely to establish an empathic attitude toward animals. Some zoos assist in the rehabilitation of wildlife and take in exotic pets that people no longer desire or can care for. Animals are taken care of in zoos for that reason. Because of that, Zoos keep animals safe because animals get taken care of.
Additionally, Zoos help to keep species from becoming extinct. A species kept in captivity serves as a backup population in the event of a population crash or extinction in the wild. They can be bred up to produce foundation populations in Zoos since they are generally safe. Animals in Zoos are Safe for that reason.
All in all, I believe that keeping animals in Zoos is safe and okay because they are well taken care of. I think it's okay because it has its own benefits. What do you think about the idea of animals being in Zoos?
Explanation:
Please consider making this brainliest if this is what you were looking for :)
Answer:
Ethos, pathos and logos are used by Anna in her commentary by claiming her reference to what historians said about America, and how people faced discrimination and by stating facts about it.
Explanation:
"A Quilt of a Country" is a commentary written by Anna Quindlen, after the terror attacks of September 11, 2001. In her essay commentary, she had used the persuasive mode of Ethos (appeal to authority or character) by supporting her claim with reference to what historian Daniel Boorstin wrote about the nation of America. He says that the United States is the only country in the world which is not build on someone's image. And uses this statement to define that why she thinks that America is like so, because it was built like a quilt "bit-by-bit".
Then, she uses pathos (appeal to emotions) by stating that how America had faced many problems of discrimination but still stood as a one nation during the time of emergency.
And lastly, she used logos (appeal to logic) by stating facts and by giving references to historical occurrences in the US.
Explanation:
They would act like jealous or something if they saw everyone in a group accept they were the only one and they would act sad
