Okay call your credit card company up and ask them where the last purchase was and if your scared someone hacked into your account shut down your credit card. (if you do this you'll have to get a new one)<span />
Answer: Yes it is
Explanation:
The Permanent Income Hypothesis posits that human expenditure in the short term is based on the amount of income they expect to get as income over the long term.
If a person for instance, knows that they will receive a pay cut at the end of the year, they will probably spend less today to survive the pay cut.
Same goes for the worker in this scenario. They know that the amount they saved is all they have now and into the future so they are adjusting their expenses to ensure they survive on that saving.
Answer:
Job enlargement.
Explanation:
Job enlargement refers to the process of adding challenges or new responsibilities to an employee’s current job.
Answer:
Yes, Dealer could collect damages from GM because basically GM breached the contract. Any time a contract is breached, the non-breaching party can sue. But the real question here is what amount could the court assign to Dealer as compensation for damages incurred. If you want to rephrase this question, it would be: What damages did Dealer suffer due to GM's breach.
If the damages are not significant, then the court will probably assign some amount for nominal damages. To be honest, the greatest expenses here are actually the legal costs of the lawsuit. Unless Dealer can prove that assigning the contract actually hurt them (which I doubt), then the court will assign a small amount. Sometimes nominal damages can be very small and mostly symbolic, e.g. $1.
