Answer:
Cyclically balanced budget
Explanation:
False because deviance is not a response to learned behavior
<em>"Historically, it has been proven that the wright brothers spent all their money on building and testing their airplane. Although it was a genius idea, their attempt wasn't very successful. The Wright Brothers then lost all their wealth, and could not afford to buy paint..."</em>
Quoted from "Hogwash History"
Answer:
B. Question the Parents further about the accident.
Explanation:
I think the summary judgement would be inappropriate in this case
Summary judgement is entered by the court if the plaintiff does not have sufficient evidence that the defendants actually do what they're accused of before moving to trial.
On this case, There is a strong proof that peoples restaurant is aware of Hoag's alcoholism : <u>intoxicated</u>
This mean that sabo can proof that the bar know hoag is an alcoholic and had served enough amount to hoag to get him intoxicated.
This mean that Sabo's case is strong enough to be brought to the trial. keep in mind that Sabo is unlikely to win the trial since the restaurant does not directly involved in the accident. but we can definitely say that summary judgement would be inappropriate in this case.
