There is no objective answer to this question, as both sides have arguments that support their views.
If you believe that you are bound by Hobbes' argument, it is because of tacit consent. Tacit consent means that, even though you have not explicitly agreed to follow laws, you have indicated your agreement through other means, for example, by using the public services of the government or by remaining within the limits of your country. Also, you could argue that any rational person would prefer to follow the rules of the government than to live in the state of nature. Therefore, if you are rational, your consent is assumed. Finally, you could also argue that while you did not explicitly agreed, maybe your ancestors did, which still binds you as a member of the same society.
On the other hand, if you believe that you are not bound by Hobbes' argument, you could argue that any contract that is not freely agreed upon is not valid. As the government uses force to make you act according to the law, you cannot be considered to be freely consenting. Also, you can argue that agreeing to follow some rules does not imply following <em>all</em> of the laws of the country. Finally, a common argument against Hobbes is the lack of empirical data. As we do not know if the state of nature is actually bad, or if the contract ever happened, the government cannot gain its legitimacy in that way.
<u>Answer:</u> Akhenaten
Akhenaten, previously known as Amenhotep IV was a pharaoh from the 18th dynasty that ruled Egypt for 17 years. He is famous for trying to move from the polytheistic traditional religion of Egypt to a monotheistic one, centered on the Aten, a solar deity.
He is also famous as husband of Queen Nefertiti and father of King Tutankhamun. His attempt at cultural change was not well-received in Egypt, and after his death, his monuments were destroyed and his name deleted from the record of kings.
Answer:Hunting and gathering society.
Hunting and gathering society is a type of society where dwellers rely majorly on hunting for wild animals andgathering of foods ,nuts and vegetables for survival.Ten thousand years ago,all societies practices hunting and gathering to provide food on their tables until there were initiatives on how to cultivate crops and rear animals.
Explanation:
I believe the answer is: Blueberries are only one of many flavonoid-rich foods that may slow cognitive decline, but can contribute to an overall healthy diet high in plant foods.
Like any other fruits, blueberries are high in fiber and vitamin, which would prevent your body form deteriorating too early. One downside of fruits like this is that it typically contain high amount of sugar compared to vegetables. So eating too much of it would not be a good idea.
Answer:
Explanation:
It wasn't exactly disagreeable speech. The Supreme Court wrangled about the place of the American Flag in American life.
The core issue was whether or not desecration of the US flag is protected by the First Amendment. The Supreme Court's final decision was yes but only by a 5-4 margin.
So in effect disagreeable speech was upheld. Various attempts have been made to make burning of the flag just going a bit too far. All attempts have failed and the right to disagreeable speech has been upheld.
