Answer:
<h3>public policy or social values.</h3>
Explanation:
Public policies are laws, regulations, governmental programs, etc. that helps a government run smoothly and efficiently. Similarly, social values are norms which are derived from distinguished desires and beliefs of a society.
In Export Co. v. Imports, Inc., there is not precedent on which the court can base a decision. The court can consider, among other things, public policy or social values to derive its decision.
This is done because when there are no precedents to be referred at, the most efficient measure that the court can take is by considering the social norms and other public policies which may help in concluding a meaningful decision.
According to a political perspective, the statement which is not an example of checks and balances is "<u>the supreme court can impeach the president and reject appointments made by the president."</u>
<h3>What are Checks and Balances?</h3>
Checks and Balances are part of the government principle whereby government separations into different branches. Each is authorized to prevent actions by other branches and is prompted to share power.
Usually, the principle of checks and balances is commonly found in constitutional governments.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is "<u>the supreme court can impeach the president and reject appointments made by the president</u>."
The available options are:
A. The supreme court can declare actions by the president and laws passed by Congress unconstitutional.
B. The president nominates supreme court justices, and the Senate must confirm the nominations.
C. The supreme court can impeach the president and reject appointments made by the president.
D. The president can veto laws passed by congress, and congress can override a presidential veto.
Learn more about Checks and Balances here: brainly.com/question/8927972
Answer:
In this instance I don't think so. He was going way to fast in a school zone. Somethings can be ignored but I don't think that this was ethical.
Explanation:
Answer:To the extent that the AUSFTA medicines provisions may represent an important precedent in a global strategy by industry on cost-effectiveness
To the extent that the AUSFTA medicines provisions may represent an important precedent in a global strategy by industry on cost-effectiveness
Explanation:
Answer:
Courts of general jurisdiction have authority to hear any type of case within its geographical and governmental jurisdiction, except where prohibited by law. These courts are often called “district courts,” or “superior courts,” depending on the state.
Explanation: