-The had a huge army so they would overwhelm the opponent and use their people for other wars
-advanced weapons in their time
- create a civil war in the opposing country to weaken them
Answer:
It was a failed plan to unite the American colonies
Explanation:
Answer: the practice of human sacrifice
Explanation: The Aztec Empire, or the Triple Alliance was an alliance of three Nahua city-states: Mexico-Tenochtitlan, Texcoco and Tlacopan. These three city-states ruled the area in and around the Valley of Mexico from 1428 until the combined forces of the Spanish conquistadores and their native allies defeated them in 1521.
The Aztec Empire was organized with a strong central government headed by the emperor. The priests and warriors came next and they were made up of nobles who enjoyed a high status in Aztec society. The bulk of Aztec armies however, were made up of commoners who are required to serve time in compulsory military service. Serving in the military was also the only way for a commoner to attain higher status in the Aztec Empire.
The sacrifice of war captives was an important part of many of the Aztec religious festivals. Warfare therefore served a dual purpose for the Aztecs. It was the main driving force of the Aztec economy and secondly it was directly tied to the success of their religious practices.
The correct answer for the question that is being presented above is this one: "by promoting pride in your country." The best example of how the media creates cultural diffusion is that b<span>y promoting pride in your country.</span>
The best answer would be D.
The debate over whether a bill of rights should be added to the Constitution or not, started from some delegates' beliefs that guarantees of certain basic rights were missing from the ratified Constitution. They wanted some amendments to be included, in order to secure those liberties to the citizens.
The Federalists (those who supported the ratification of the Constitution) argued that the Constitution did not need a bill of rights because the people and the states kept any powers not given to the federal gonvernmnet. Alexander Hamilton, for example, argued that because the proposed federal government would possess only specifically assigned limited powers, ir could not threaten the fundamental liberties of the people. Anti-Federalists, however, held that a bill of rights was necessary to safeguard individual liberty and the power of the states.