The South opposed the Wilmot Proviso because it would have prevented any new territories from having slavery in them.
In 1846, Congressman David Wilmot of Pennsylvania introduced the proviso as an amendment to an appropriations bill in connection with the peace treaty being negotiated with Mexico. His amendment stipulated that any territory gained from Mexico would be free, not allowing slavery. The specific language of the proviso went like this:
<span><em>Provided, That, as an express and fundamental condition to the acquisition of any territory from the Republic of Mexico by the United States, by virtue of any treaty which may be negotiated between them, and to the use by the Executive of the moneys herein appropriated, neither slavery nor involuntary servitude shall ever exist in any part of said territory, except for crime, whereof the party shall first be duly convicted</em>.
</span>
Wilmot's amendment passed in the House of Representatives, but was unable to get approval in the Senate. The high-intensity debate over slavery and the expansion of slavery was evidenced by how things went with the "Wilmot Proviso."
<span>he fails to deliver an important letter to Romeo.</span>
Answer:
- In the late 1700s, Indian farmers produced cotton that was shipped to British factories to produce textiles.
Explanation:
Amid the late 1700s, farmers in India delivered cotton and sent them to certain industrial facilities in the British nations to create materials. In this century, the development of India from exchanging and agrarian culture to an economy of administrations and assembling was the financial history of India. Be that as it may, India was as yet ready to get by on their farming.
That it’s America’s destiny to control all the land from sea to sea
