Answer:
Let us assume that the original purse is $100. The price after the first reduction is $80. After the second reduction the price is now $56.
Step-by-step explanation:
hope this helps
What type of data? Usually, mean is the best representative.
If a 12 oz bottle of shampoo lasted for 16 weeks, we have a ratio of 12:16 which can be shortened to 3:4.
Now if we have 18 oz bottle we know that it's 1/2 more than 12 oz bottle, so the ratio will be also 1/2 more. So if it was 12:16, the new ratio will be:
12 + (1/2 * 12) : 16 + (1/2 * 16)
12 + 6 : 16 + 8
18 : 24
It means that 18 oz bottle should last for 24 weeks. Of course the ratio has to stay the same in its lowest form in both situations and as 18:24 can be shortened to 3:4, it proves it's correct :)
Answer:
X<-11/2
Step-by-step explanation:
Hope I helped:)
All the steps were correct except the final statement. The
mistake was in Line 6.
Line 6 triangle ABC is congruent to triangle EFD by
SAS.
<span>This does not follow. The SAS postulate states
that if two sides and the included angle of one triangle is congruent to two sides
and the included angle of another triangle. The student only proved that one side
of the triangle (AC) is congruent to the side of another triangle (EF) .</span>
