Answer:
Cherokee Nation v. Georgia.
Explanation:
The 1831 Supreme Court case of the Cherokee Nation v. Georgia was a court ruling between the Cherokee Nation, the petitioners, against the state of Georgia, the respondent.
In this court case, the Cherokees filed a complaint against the State of Georgia, asking if the state has any jurisdiction to impose laws on the Nation. This was because the state has promised Cherokee lands to Georgian settlers if they settle in the state. The court decided that since the Cherokees are a dependent nation, it cannot make any decision as it has no jurisdiction over the case. Thus, this means that the Cherokee Nation cannot have any legal recourse to stop the state from taking their lands. This case was then followed up by the 1832 Worcester v. Georgia ruling where the court ruled in favor of the Cherokee people.
Thus, the correct answer is Cherokee Nation v. Georgia.
They can elect the president in the event of a tie
Answer:
custodial
Explanation:
when parents divorce and move to separate residences the parents who live in the same household as the children referred as the custodial parent.
A custodial parent is the parent who is given physical or legitimate authority of a youngster by court request. Joint physical guardianship, or shared child rearing, implies that the kid lives with the two guardians for rise to or around equivalent measures of time. In joint care, the two guardians are custodial guardians and neither one of the parents is a non-custodial parent.
Answer:
Suffrage or political franchise, is the right to vote in public, political elections or any sort of voting outside of the political world.
Hope this helps!
P.s this is in my own words, but try to rephrase it into your own sentences. If you can't, feel free to use my words.
