<u>Answer:</u>
Strict immigration laws did not influence the economic development of the United States.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- Though the United States adopted strict immigration laws in order to filter the unwanted immigrants from flooding the country, many others who could comply with these laws moved to the United States and contributed to its growth and prosperity.
- The laws put up certain criterions that only allowed deserving people to flow in.
- Thus, strict immigration laws did not directly influence the functioning of the overall economy.
Answer:
Your life would be like those people that live in an apartheid country. You have no freedom of movement like the Palestinian people do. Your life would be segregated and you would remain with people of your own color and culture. You would lose out on employment opportunities, educational opportunities, and the right to the American dream.
Explanation:
It would be the Caribbean sea! Hope this helps!
Answer:
engaged in global markets.
Explanation:
Image result for What can political and economists in other nations learn from the issues Sweden has dealt with ?
Nordic countries show that major egalitarian reforms and substantial welfare states are possible within prosperous capitalist countries that are highly engaged in global markets. But their success undermines the view that the most ideal capitalist economy is one where markets are unrestrained.
