Your question isn't formulated with enough information, but I'll try my best. Sensitivity levels is what I believe is the answer to this question. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
Answer:The court’s decision ruled that the laws of Louisiana were not in conflict with the Constitution. The justices wrote that Plessy’s defense wrongly assumed that separate facilities somehow made one race automatically inferior to another.
Further, they ruled that if one race is already socially inferior to another, there was nothing that the Constitution or other acts of legislation could do to fix that. To this end, the majority opinion states that the Fourteenth Amendment “could not have been intended to abolish distinctions based upon color, or to enforce social, as distinguished from political, equality, or a commingling of the two races upon terms unsatisfactory to either.”
Explanation: This comes directly from the answer.
Answer: it’s a very complex and hard system but the US uses this system because if something goes through it people on both sides can agree or disagree with something and if they do it’s passed on to another system within the federal chain hope this answers you’re question!
Explanation:
Answer:
Title IX disapprove of any discrimination based on sex in education.
Explanation:
Title IX of education was enacted into law on June 23, 1972. According to this, no student should be prohibited from receiving education based on sex. This rule is applicable in all those educational institutions that are federally funded.
So, the work of the Title IX rule is to remove or stop any kind of discrimination in schools or any educational institutions based on sex.
The City of Carchemish above Damascus in Syria.
