The premise that explains the wife's inductive reasoning for determining her husband's level of safety at work will be,
The wife assumes that her husband's employer has insured him with retirement and health benefits.
<h3>What is inductive reasoning?</h3>
When a person or an individual makes assumptions regarding an observation based on a general principle that is derived through the course of such assumptions in known as inductive reasoning.
In the given example, it can be concluded that the wife has derived a general principle that it is safe for her husband to continue his job as he has high level of personal and financial safety at his work.
Hence, the significance of inductive reasoning is aforementioned.
Learn more about the inductive reasoning here:
brainly.com/question/16685989
#SPJ1
Hm, are you sure you got the question right? Because all of the sentences are written in active voice! Active voice is essentially everything that is not in the passive voice, and I don't see any passive voice here.
Passive voice would be formed with subject+form of "to be" + past participle,
and we have no example of this. All of the sentences here are in active voice.
Answer:
Begging the question
Explanation:
The fallacy of begging the question occurs when an argument's premises assume the truth of the conclusion, instead of supporting it. In other words, you assume without proof the stand/position, or a significant part of the stand, that is in question.
Based on the context you would know which words don't belong or actually do belong so using the context as your guide it should help you know which words to look up.
The answer is keep your ideas to yourself
