All categories

3 years ago

Evaluate 9ab, for a = 5 and b = - 7

2 answers:

8 0

$\huge\boxed{\textsf{Hey there!}}\\\\\\\huge\boxed{\mathsf{9ab}}\\\huge\boxed{\mathsf{= 9(5)(-7)}}\\\huge\boxed{\mathsf{= 45(-7)}}\\\huge\boxed{\mathsf{= -315}}\\\huge\boxed{\frak{Answer: -315}}\huge\checkmark\\\\\huge\boxed{\textsf{Good luck on your assignment \& enjoy your day!}}\\\\\huge\boxed{\frak{Amphitrite1040:)}}$

Yuri [45]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

-315

Step-by-step explanation:

Plug in 5 as a and -7 as b into the term:

9ab

9(5)(-7)

Multiply:

= -315

So, the answer is -315.

You might be interested in

PLEASE HELP

irina [24]

Answer:

$12\sqrt{3}$ feet

Step-by-step explanation:

In a 30-60-90 triangle, the ratios of the side lengths of the triangle is $1:\sqrt{3} :2$

Where 1 is the shortest leg, root(3) is the longer leg, and 2 is the hypotenuse.

First we can set x equals to the length of the original pole, and so the shorter leg has a length of x/3 and using the ratio of side lengths, we can find that:

$\frac{x}{3} * \sqrt{3} = \frac{\sqrt{3} x}{3} = 12$

Solving for x, we find that

$x=\frac{36}{\sqrt{3} } = \frac{36 * \sqrt{3} }{\sqrt{3} * \sqrt{3} } = \frac{36 \sqrt{3} }{3} = 12\sqrt{3}$

So the length of the original pole would be $12\sqrt{3}$ feet

If you found this answer helpful, please consider marking it as brainliest, or give it a thanks and a 5 star review. Thanks!

6 0

3 years ago

Solve the compound inequality: 3x ≤ 18 AND x + 4 > 2

dedylja [7]

There must be a mistake in your question:
If 3 x ≤ 9, then : x ≤ 3 and :
x + 4 > 2
x > 2 - 4
x > - 2
Answer: D)
Solution set : - 2 < x ≤ 3

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

You want to obtain a sample to estimate a population proportion. At this point in time, you have no reasonable preliminary estim

pogonyaev

Answer:

$n=\frac{0.5(1-0.5)}{(\frac{0.025}{1.28})^2}=655.36$

And rounded up we have that n=656

Step-by-step explanation:

In order to find the critical value we need to take in count that we are finding the interval for a proportion, so on this case we need to use the z distribution. Since our interval is at 80% of confidence, our significance level would be given by $\alpha=1-0.80=0.20$ and $\alpha/2 =0.10$ . And the critical value would be given by:

$z_{\alpha/2}=\pm 1.28$

Solution to the problem

The margin of error for the proportion interval is given by this formula:

$ME=z_{\alpha/2}\sqrt{\frac{\hat p (1-\hat p)}{n}}$ (a)

Since we don't have prior info for the proportion of interest we can use $\hat p=0.5$ as estimator. And on this case we have that $ME =\pm 0.025$ and we are interested in order to find the value of n, if we solve n from equation (a) we got:

$n=\frac{\hat p (1-\hat p)}{(\frac{ME}{z})^2}$ (b)

And replacing into equation (b) the values from part a we got:

$n=\frac{0.5(1-0.5)}{(\frac{0.025}{1.28})^2}=655.36$

And rounded up we have that n=656

5 0

3 years ago

Round 552,945 to the place value

Lostsunrise [7]

If rounded to the nearest 100,000th it would be 600,000

if rounded to the nearest 10,000th it would be 550,000

if rounded to the nearest 1,000 it would be 553,945

3 0

4 years ago

Hey plsss help meeeeee

nalin [4]

Answer:

The first, third, and fourth answer choices represent a function.

Step-by-step explanation:

A relation is a relationship between sets of values. The two quantities that are being related to each other are the input (x-variable) and the output (y-variable). But relations in general aren't always a good way to relate between x and y.

Say that I have situation where I want to give x dollars to the cashier so he can change them to y quarters. Here is a "example" of the relation:

Dollars (x) | Quarters (y)

----------------------------------

0 | 0

1 | 4

2 | 8

2 | 12

Do you see something wrong here? Yes! We all know that you can't exchange 2 dollars for 12 quarters. You can only exchange 2 dollars for 8 quarters and only 8 quarters. This is a general reason why we don't rely on general relations for real-life situations. One x-variable does not exactly map to one and only one y-variable.

However, a relation that can map one x-variable to one and only one y-variable is known as a function. Let's make the above example an actual function to prove a point:

Dollars (x) | Quarters (y)

----------------------------------

0 | 0

1 | 4

2 | 8

3 | 12

Now, the 3 dollars make 12 quarters as it should. This is how a function should look like.

There are two ways to check if a relation is a function. On a relation, table, or a set of ordered pairs, you have to make sure there is no "x-variable" that repeats. All x-values of a relation have to be unique in order to be a function. On a graph, you can also perform the Vertical Line Test. If you draw vertical lines over a relation and if the lines cross only once, then it is a function. If not, it fails the Vertical Line Test.

So to answer you're question, the first, third, and fourth choices are functions because they all have unique x-variables. The second choice is not a function because it fails the Vertical Line Test.

7 0

3 years ago