Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Greatest multiplier of 4 that is less than 21 is 5 (4 x 5 = 20)
Put the remaining number as the numerator (21 - 20 = 1)
Answer: Normally C/C++
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
(0,1)- y intercept (1,0) x intercept
Step-by-step explanation:
first lets write this equation in slope intercept form: y=mx+b
m=slope
b=y intercept
so
slope formula:
(y2-y1)/(x2-x1)
y2=-3
y1=9
x2=4
x1=-8
so
(-3-9)/(4--8)=-12/12=-1
slope=-1
hence
y=-1x+b
substitute "x" as 4 and "y" as -3
so
-3=-1(4)+b
-3=-4+b
1=b
so
y=-x+1
1=y intercept
and
0=-x+1
-1=-x
1=x
1=x intercept
Answer:
Neither parallel nor perpendicular
Step-by-step explanation:
I'm assuming you meant line k is y = 3x -2. If not, this is wrong.
For this, you need to put both lines in point-slope form, or the form that line k is already in. This means you only need to convert line m.
-2r + 6v = 18
6v = 2r + 18
v = 2/6r + 18/6
v = 1/3r + 3
Now you can answer the question.
To be parallel, lines must have the same slope (but a different y-intercept). 3 and 1/3 are not the same, so the lines are not parallel.
To be perpendicular, one line must have the opposite reciprocal (fraction flipped and + goes to - or - to +) of the other. While 3 is the reciprocal of 1/3, they are both positive, so they are not perpendicular.
To be the same line, the equations must be absolutely identical, which they aren't.
This leaves the last option: neither.
Let me know if you need a more in-depth explanation of anything here! I'm happy to help!
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
if u is an irrational number added to a rational number (sqrt 15) to yield 2, then that would mean u would = root -1.78.....
which means you wouldn't have a real solution. if you want a complex answer, it would be sqrt(1.78)i
