The most logical answer is D
P(t) = (0.83)t^(5/4)
<span>2096 - 2015 = 81 </span>
<span>81 ^ (5/4) = 243 </span>
<span>243 × 0.83 = 201.69 </span>
<span>Population in 2096 expected to be 202 million.</span>
Answer:
I agree with Mike because pure risks involve only possible losses. Since he owns his house, the possibility of it burning down would represent only a loss to him.
But if he buys insurance, he will pay an insurance premium which means that if the house burns down, the company will lose money, but if the hose doesn't burn down, the insurance company will make a profit. This represents speculative risk because the possibility of a gain and a loss exist.
Answer:
d. 8.2%
Explanation:
The computation of the WACC is shown below:
= Weightage of debt × cost of debt × ( 1- tax rate) + (Weightage of common stock) × (cost of common stock)
where,
Weighted of debt = Debt ÷ total firm
= (0.60 ÷ 1.60)
= 0.375
And, the weighted of common stock = (Common stock ÷ total firm)
= 1 ÷ 1.60
= 0.625
The total firm is
= 0.60 + 1
= 1.60
Now put these values to the above formula
So, the value would equal to
= (0.375 × 8%) × ( 1 - 35%) + (0.625 × 10%)
= 1.95% + 6.25%
= 8.20%
The answer is "<u>The disagreement between these economists is most likely due to differences in scientific judgments."</u>
It isn't surprising that as the inquiry proceeds with, researchers at times differ about the bearing in which truth lies. Economists regularly differ for a similar reason. Economics is a youthful science, and there is still much to be educated. Economists here and there differ in light of the fact that they have distinctive hunches about the legitimacy of elective hypotheses or about the extent of critical parameters that measure how monetary factors are connected.
