The question is incomplete. This is the complete question:
Which of the following is not a permissible circumstance under which to implement a prior restraint, under Near v. Minnesota?
a. obscene publications.
b. Fighting words likely to promote immense violence.
c. Obstruction of military recruitment.
d. Publication of troop movement in the time of war.
Answer:
The answer is b. Fighting words likely to promote immense violence.
Explanation:
Although it is possible for certain words to cause immense violence when used in publications, under Near v. Minnesota (a United States Supreme Court decision which declared that prior restraints on publication violated the freedom of speech and press) it is still not permissible to implement a prior restraint, even when publications use fighting words that are likely to promote immense violence.
The central domestic issues concerned government regulation of railroads and large corporations
You have been living your whole life on a planet. Planets make up solar systems, solar systems make up galaxies, and galaxies make up universes which make up all of existence in space.
After a while, self-talk becomes second nature to children, and they can act without verbalizing, thus creating a form of <u>inner speech,</u> which becomes their thoughts.
<u>Explanation</u>:
Self-talk is an internal speech in which a person talks to oneself. The inner voice of the person provides a running verbal monologue of thoughts. This happens when they are in conscious. Generally self-talk is based on the sense of the person.
Self-talk can be either positive or negative. <u>Negative self-talk</u> may reduce the self-esteem of the person and may also cause stress.
<u>Positive self-talk</u> can help in encouraging the individual. It is the way of self-motivation.
