The answer is increases.
By increasing the decentralized power, the Voters/Citizens will became less involved in the regulation process.
In this situation, The government who held the final say for the potential regulations will only made the regulation that benefit a certain groups/people that contribute the most to their campaign.
Answer:
B) negatively correlated.
Explanation:
The case is set, would reflect a negative correlation between wealth and marital satisfaction.
This means that not necessarily the wealth would cause marriages to report higher levels of happiness or satisfaction. This would imply that there is an inverse relationship between two variables - when one variable decreases, the other increases. So to the contrary, it would mean the opposite. Having less money would favor marital satisfaction.
It is so believed that money issues are important variables so, they should be reconsidered. In the case as stated having more money turns into less satisfaction of the pair.
A example that is similar to this as a negative correlation, is the birth of children, and mariage, since the condition creates stress that the new creature poses to the relationship between the pair, that was often better treated.
Answer:
Yes, it has always been relevant.
Explanation:
Answer:
The correct answer is: Jazz.
Explanation:
<u>Jazz music was extremely popular during the years of prohibition (1920's to 1930s) and it was part of the underworld. </u>
<u>Jazz was commonly played live in speakeasies, which were underground places dedicated to the selling and consumption of alcoholic beverages. In these places, people went to relax, drink alcohol, and "speak-easy" during the prohibition years. </u>
Jazz music was then associated with illegal and inmoral activities and it started to generate the genre's reputation for threatening the country's cultural values.
In conclusion, the correct answer is: Jazz.
The appropriate response is the second one. Verifiably, "objectivity" wound up noticeably important for daily papers and writers on the grounds that culpable the most modest number of individuals implied procuring the biggest benefit.
