Answer:
The factor that would not be an ethical problem is:
b. if others are unable to replicate her findings.
Explanation:
We must keep in mind we were asked to find what is NOT an ethical problem.
Ethics is a system of moral principles. It is what provides us with a sort of moral map, a guide concerning right and wrong, appropriate and inappropriate. <u>When it comes to publishing papers, ethics concerns aspects such as plagiarism, fraudulent publication, authorship etc. In simpler words, an ethical paper should be faithful to the truth.</u>
Options a, c, and d violate ethics in the sense that Dr. Scott would be making up data. She would be lying if she said she conducted a study when she didn't, when she omitted data that contradicted the results she presented, and when she came up with untrue data to support her theory. On the other hand, <u>if she truly conducted the study and truly obtained the results presented, there would be nothing against ethics in her paper. Even if other researches couldn't replicate her findings for some reason, Dr. Scott's paper wouldn't have an ethical problem.</u>
Answer:
This poem uses personification to bring life to the morning and night to describe with clear detail, what the dawn looks like.
When the poem says "night woke to blush", it is a specific example of personification (because "night" is a concept and not a living thing, but it is being given the ability to do human things). This creates meaning because it is a fun way to imagine the pink hue to the sky during dawn.
The personification also develops mood and tone because it makes the reader feel like they're watching an interaction between two living things, not just the transition from night to day .
Hope this helps :)
It's PQRS, the one in the middle
Release from a leash or restraint
This question is missing the excerpt with the underlined sentences. I was able to find it online:
Read the excerpt from "Enrique's Journey":
The train <u>passes into northern Chiapas.</u> Enrique sees men with h.o.es tending their corn and women inside their kitchens patting tortillas into shape. Cowboys ride past and smile. Fieldworkers have their machetes and cheer the migrants on: "Qué bueno!" <u>Mountains draw closer. Plantain fields soften into cow pastures</u>. Enrique's train slows to a crawl. Monarch<u> butterflies flutter alongside, overtaking his car.</u>
NOTE: I typed h.o.es like this so that Brainly will not interpret it as a bad word.
Answer:
The underlined phrases support the author's purpose because:
C. They show that the worst part of the train ride may be over.
Explanation:
American journalist Sonia Nazario (born 1960) won the Pulitzer Prize for "Enrique's Journey", which tells the story of the 17-year-old boy from Honduras and his journey to be reunited with his mother.
<u>In the particular passage we are analyzing here, the author is describing a transition. The landscape changes once Enrique reaches Chiapas, a region in Mexico. The boy can now see several people, their homes, cow pastures, and mountains. His train also slows down. The author gives such details to show that the worst part of the train ride may be over. This is a sign that Enrique has already conquered a great deal of his journey.</u>