Answer:
Entrepreneurs are born and not made.
Explanation:
In order to be an entrepreneur you must have good business ethic and life skills, no one can make you have the mindset and ethic of an entrepreneur only influence on the skills you are already born with.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "C": a result of more efficient resource allocation than would be observed in the absence of trade.
Explanation:
Trade has allowed societies to exchange their products according to their needs. Thanks to trade those goods are distributed accordingly more <em>efficiently </em>since, in isolation, countries would be specialists of certain types of products only which is unlikely to be enough to cover all the individuals' needs in those societies.
Explanation:
The long-running debate between the ‘rational design’ and ‘emergent process’ schools of strategy formation has involved caricatures of firms' strategic planning processes, but little empirical evidence of whether and how companies plan. Despite the presumption that environmental turbulence renders conventional strategic planning all but impossible, the evidence from the corporate sector suggests that reports of the demise of strategic planning are greatly exaggerated. The goal of this paper is to fill this empirical gap by describing the characteristics of the strategic planning systems of multinational, multibusiness companies faced with volatile, unpredictable business environments. In-depth case studies of the planning systems of eight of the world's largest oil companies identified fundamental changes in the nature and role of strategic planning since the end of the 1970s. The findings point to a possible reconciliation of ‘design’ and ‘process’ approaches to strategy formulation. The study pointed to a process of planned emergence in which strategic planning systems provided a mechanism for coordinating decentralized strategy formulation within a structure of demanding performance targets and clear corporate guidelines. The study shows that these planning systems fostered adaptation and responsiveness, but showed limited innovation and analytical sophistication
To determine the increase in the amount of money in the economy brought about the $600 taken out of the piggy bank, we multiply $600 by the decimal equivalent of the percentage given. That is,
($600) x (0.02) = $12
Hence, your $600 will increase the amount of money in the economy by $12.
Consider an economy that is operating at its steady state. an increase in the investment rate in this economy will lead to a temporary increase in the growth rate.
In the Solow model, a larger saving rate has no long-term impact on the growth rate. Higher steady-state capital stock and level of output do follow a higher saving rate. The growth rate briefly increases as production changes from a lower to a higher steady-state level. Low rates of saving the result in small capital stock in the steady state and low levels of output in the steady state. Only in the near run do higher savings translate into quicker economic development. Up until the economy reaches its new steady state, an increase in the saving rate causes growth to accelerate.
Learn more about the economy here brainly.com/question/1106682
#SPJ1.
