Answer:
whats the question? i'm not sure what you're trying to ask here
Step-by-step explanation:
30°, 70°, and 80°.
It is an acute-angled triangle.
Explanation:
The ratio of the measures of ∠s in Δ is 3:7:8.
So, let us suppose that the measures are, 3k, 7k, 8k.
Evidently, their sum is
180°.
3k+7k+8k=180
18k=180
k= 10
Hence, the measures are,
30°, 70°, and 80°.
As all the angles are acute, so is the triangle.
Answer:
a)what was concluded is spurious
b) what was concluded could betrue
Step-by-step explanation:
a) Considering the number in Michigan, there is higher number of crimes but considering the population in Minnesota, the population is much less than Michigan, considering the crime the crimes per capital with the population size, Therefore Minnesota could have more crimes than Michigan's so, The conclusion is not true.
b)There is reduction of crimes from 1991 to 2001, so it can be assumed that the population has increased over the times, therefore, the per capita number of crimes decreased.
I think 2,057.21 because 18,541.89 divided by 9 is 2,057.21
Change 1 hour 15 minutes = 1.25 hour because 15 ÷ 60 = 0.25 so we add 0.25 hour and change 2 3/4 to 2.75
Equation:
Multiply 2.75 × 1 = 2.75 ÷ 1.25 =
2.2 miles
I'm pretty sure this is correct
