Https://www.cliffsnotes.com/literature/o/old-testament-of-the-bible/summary-and-analysis/ezekiel
a. In the prisoners' dilemma game self-interest leads each prisoner to confess. to a breakdown of any agreement that the prisoners might have made before being questioned to an outcome that is not particularly good for either prisoner.
What is prisoners' dilemma game?
The prisoner's dilemma is a common illustration of a game explored in game theory that demonstrates why two logical people could disagree even though it seems to be in their best interests to collaborate.
The possible outcomes:
- If A and B each betray the other, each of them serves two years in prison
- If A betrays B but B remains silent, A will be set free and B will serve three years in prison
- If A remains silent but B betrays A, A will serve three years in prison and B will be set free
- If A and B both remain silent, both of them will serve one year in prison (on the lesser charge).
Learn more about prisoners' dilemma here:
brainly.com/question/22597804
#SPJ4
Answer:If 2 people from different cultures wanted to get married it would be hard for them.
Or because of countries hating on each other.
Explanation:
Carrying into Execution the foregoing powers.
Answer: D. Maria would not have to pay anything
Explanation:
Maria would not have to pay anything because this does not fall under the terms of a QUASI CONTRACT as she did not gain unjustified enrichment.
In a QUASI contract, the main bone of contention is the ACCEPTANCE of a service but not the AGREEMENT of terms which can lead to unjust enrichment. In other words, if you ACCEPT a service but did not request it, you still have to pay.
Maria in this case neither requested NOR ACCEPTED the service and so she does not have to pay.
