Answer:
I am prepared to stop oil extraction and use of petroleum.
Explanation:
Yes, I support a global push to go away from oil towards cleaner fuel sources regardless of much it might affect us. As a citizen of Saudi Arabia, I know that our country's economy depends on the extraction of fuel and its contribution is the backbone of our country.
However, if we look into impact it has on the environment, it is really disheartening. The earth is getting rapidly warmer each day, many animal species are on the verge of extinction, there are multitudes of environmental crisis everywhere, and the polluted air is affecting the lives of millions.
I understand that doing away with extraction of oil would greatly affect the standard of living of many people, yet it is worth the risk. The government of Saudi Arabia can always look for alternative ways to invest our billions of revenue into other avenues such as technology, tourism, corporate, renewable energy, etc.
We can adopt economic measures and practices like Japan and Korea where investments are channelled into technology and computer science. Though doing away with extraction of feul may put lots of people at stake, the future generations would at least have a better and cleaner earth. We cannot deny the implications of petroleum and it is becoming very threatening everyday. Therfore, I am prepared to stop oil extraction and use of petroleum.
Answer:
The correct option is "Negative"
Explanation:
Please see the attached text for the excerpt.
The candidates' next sentence gives the clue to the answer. He responds by saying he is not ready for mudslinging yet.
To sling mud or Mudslinging is an idiomatic expression which connotes trying to damage someone's reputation by saying insolent or negative things about them.
Cheers!
Answer:
C. The Berlin Conference held in Germany
Explanation:
In the context of the Industrial Revolution, which was in full steam in Europe during the end of the 19th century, commodity and natural resource-rich Africa started to draw more and more of the world’s attention.
In the late 1800s, representatives from fourteen countries met in Berlin to discuss how to divvy up their competing claims on Africa and its resources. Motivated by their desire to avoid a power struggle amongst themselves, representatives at the Berlin Conference drew colonial boundaries in Africa and decided matters ranging from trade rights to control over major rivers without a single African representative present.
Although many Africans resisted the ensuing colonization of their region, Europeans moved quickly to exploit existing political divisions among the region’s kingdoms and leveraged a distinct advantage: guns. By 1914, European powers controlled almost 90 percent of the continent.
Hope this helps! :)
<em>Stay Cold, </em>
<em>Brook</em>
James Madison, if you ever forget try and remember that the author has a first name for his last name too:)
Answer:
One difference between consensus and conflict theories are that consensus emphasises harmony, integration and stability within society. Conflict theories, however, stress conflict, struggle and change. ... This is shared values which are agreed upon by society as a whole. Whereas, conflict theorists do not believe this
Explanation: