What argument would I present? I would present that everyone is equal and everyone has a voice if you had asked them to speak, people have different outlooks on being able to vote at 18 or 21. But I don't know much about voting, I don't, and don't plan on, voting ever. Soooooo.....
Answer:
B. the right to an attorney
Answer:
Option 3
Explanation:
Convergent thinking involves searching a best fit to a solution among a given set if problems. Suppose we have a group of answers relating to a question, the use of convergent thinking involves searching for the beat answer to the question. This method is mostly applicable to exam questions that seems to be difficult to students.
Based on the explanation given above, option C best explains the answer as narrowing down the available solutions that suits a particular problem.
Answer:
False
Explanation:
The ethical obligations of a multinational corporation towards employment conditions, human rights, environmental pollution, and the use of power are not always clear cut. There are situations whereby the host nations standards are inferior to those of the home nations, this results in ethical issues and there are also situations where the available standards of the host nation are not ethically acceptable resulting in ethical dilemmas. It necessary to note that different countries have their different standards when it comes to employment conditions, human rights and environmental pollutions, this makes it difficult to have a clear cut obligations for multinational corporations, their standards and obligations will vary according to what is prevailing in the host nation.
<span>Each type of government has its own jurisdiction and powers. In the United States of America, there was a clear division between what the state oversees and what the federal government oversees. But, there are instances wherein the federal government can influence the decisions of the state government by blocking its grants.</span>
