Answer:
- 2/5x=7/20x+1/4
- -3/4=-1/20x-1/2
- -3/4+1/20x=-1/2
Step-by-step explanation:
If you add 3/4 to both sides of the equation, you get ...
... 2/5x = 7/20x + 1/4 . . . . first choice
If you subtract 2/5x from both sides of the equation, you get ...
... -3/4 = -1/20x -1/2 . . . . third choice
If you subtract 7/20x from both sides of the equation, you get ...
... -3/4 +1/20x = -1/2 . . . . last choice
Choices 2 and 4 are erroneous versions of choices 1 and 3, so do not apply.
Answer:
let dimention of original garden be x
then (x-8)(x-5) = 180
x^2 -13x -140 = 0
(x-20)(x+7)=0
x= 20 or x = -7
x = 20
original area = (20)^2
= 400 m^2
Angles C and D are supplementary, meaning they add up to 180 degrees. So, if we add 8u-48 to 5u+46, we get 13u-2. We set that equal to 180, so 13u-2=180. Add the two, so 13u=182. Divide the 13, so u=14. To double check, plug in 14 to both expressions. 8(14)-48 and 5(14)+46. 8(14)-48 is 64. 5(14)+46 is 116. If you add 64+116, you get 180, which proves your answer right! So u= 14
<h2>
Answer with explanation:</h2>
By considering the given information, we have
Null hypothesis : 
Alternative hypothesis : 
Since the alternative hypothesis is two-tailed , so the test is a two-tailed test.
Given : Sample size : n= 20, since sample size is less than 30 so the test applied is a t-test.
; 
Test statistic : 
i.e. 
Degree of freedom : n-1 = 20-1=19
Significance level = 0.01
For two tailed, Significance level 
By using the t-distribution table, the critical value of t =
Since , the observed t-value (7.25) is greater than the critical value (2.861) .
So we reject the null hypothesis, it means we have enough evidence to support the alternative hypothesis.
We conclude that there is some significance difference between the mean score for sober women and 35.0.