Answer:
$4.50
Explanation:
The sunk cost is the cost that has been incurred and is unrecoverable in the process of taking a financing decision.
If the cost of a coffee cup from a local gas station cost $5.00 and the cost of refill is $0.50, the coffee is the actual element needed and from the refill, it can be estimated that it costs $0.50.
Hence the sunk or unrecoverable cost is the difference between the coffee cup and the refill cost
= $5.00 - $0.50
= $4.50
Answer:
The correct answer is B.
Explanation:
Gross profit equals net sales minus cost of sales(Net sales- Cost of Sales).
Net sales = $325,000
Cost of Sales = $240,500
Therefore we have;
$325,000 - $240,500
=$84,500
Gross profit ratio is (Gross profit/net sales) x 100%
($84,500 x $325,000) x 100%
26%
Answer:
D) Store all chemicals in a well-lit, warm area
The available options are:
A. No contribution can be made because the woman does not have earned income
B. A contribution of up to $6,000 is permitted, but the contribution is not tax deductible.
C. A tax deductible contribution of up to $7,000 is permitted
D. A tax deductible contribution of up to $9,000 is permitted
Answer:
No contribution can be made because the woman does not have earned income
Explanation:
Unlike in the previous years before 2019, concerning divorce agreements, alimony is now declared to be no longer deductible by the payor and at the same time is considered to be a tax-free income to the recipient. In essence, this indicates that alimony is no longer qualifies as earned income and therefore, cannot be utilized to fund an Individual Retirement Account.
Hence, in this case, since it is , year 2020, the correct answer is "No contribution can be made because the woman does not have earned income."
Answer:
B) rent seeking behavior
Explanation:
Rent seeking behavior refers to actions carried out by businesses that try to seek benefits through government policies. In other words, the businesses will try to make the government give them some type of special treatment or special benefit at the expense of the general population.
In this case, the American winemakers were able to convince government officials to only serve domestic wine at government events. The problem is that the general population (taxpayers) are the ones that pay for that wine. American winemakers will benefit at the expense of the taxpayers.
