Answer:
The percentage change in nominal GDP from 2013 to 2014 was 4.29%
The percentage change in real GDP from 2012 to 2013 was 1.48%
The percentage change in real GDP from 2012 to 2013 was higher than the percentage change in real GDP from 2011 to 2012. FALSE
Explanation:
In order to calculate this we just have to calculate the percentages with a rule of thirds:

To calculate the first one we use the nominal GDP which is the GDP with the current market value:

To calculate the change in real GDP we use the values adapted to a pre-agreed monetary value, in this case the dollar at 2009:

To calculate the 2011 to 2012 we insert the values:

So with this we know that it is wasn´t higher the percentage change from 2012-2013, than that of 2011-2012
Answer:
a. 4 years
b. 19 years
c. 19 years
d. 25 years
Explanation:
The number of years, n is calculated for each future value as follows :
a. $1,360
Pv = - $1,000
Pmt = $ 0
P/y = 1
r = 8 %
Fv = $1,360
n = ?
Using a Financial Calculator, the number of years, n is 3.9953 or 4 years
b. $2,720
Pv = - $1,000
Pmt = $ 0
P/y = 1
r = 8 %
Fv = $2,720
n = ?
Using a Financial Calculator, the number of years, n is 13.00 or 13 years
c. $4,316
Pv = - $1,000
Pmt = $ 0
P/y = 1
r = 8 %
Fv = $4,316
n = ?
Using a Financial Calculator, the number of years, n is 19.00 or 19 years
d. $6,848
Pv = - $1,000
Pmt = $ 0
P/y = 1
r = 8 %
Fv = $6,848
n = ?
Using a Financial Calculator, the number of years, n is 24.9991 or 25 years
Answer:
"Problem recognition" is the correct answer.
Explanation:
- An empirical investigation has said that the initial phase of the development procedure of the customer and therefore its approach to buying seems to be the acknowledgment of problems that arise when consumers realize that perhaps the problem would also have to be solved.
- This is whenever the customer sees a requirement and is driven to rectify the conflicts.
Answer:
The correct answer is Maverick buying.
Explanation:
Maverick, is a wayward, a dissident, a rebel, someone who refuses to abide by the rules or resists joining a group. The term originates from Samuel A. Maverick (1803-1870), a Texas rancher, who refused to mark his cattle.
The "maverick buying", refers to purchases out of contract or channels established by an organization. For example, the Corporate Supply department negotiates a competitive price for certain particular models of laptops with a distributor. Days later, someone from the Human Resources department requests the purchase of a much more expensive model, for which a discount has not been negotiated.
Another example: traveling in an airline and staying in a hotel other than those with which the company has signed agreements.
The impact of bypassing the preferred purchasing channels and systems can vary from operational inefficiency, to missing out on the advantages of corporate contract negotiation, large fines and even jail time.