In my opinion, Darrin's inference is wrong because according to given question, "<em>Darrin surveyed a random sample of 10 students from his science class about their favorite types of TV shows.</em><em>"</em><em> </em>
This line provides the information that the survey is taken randomly. Also, if Darrin had taken some other students, then the ineference of other new students compared with previously surveyed students will be different.
This frankly tells that <em>t</em><em>h</em><em>e</em><em> </em><em>p</em><em>r</em><em>o</em><em>b</em><em>a</em><em>b</em><em>i</em><em>l</em><em>i</em><em>t</em><em>y</em><em> </em><em>i</em><em>s</em><em> </em><em>d</em><em>i</em><em>f</em><em>f</em><em>e</em><em>r</em><em>e</em><em>n</em><em>t</em><em> </em><em>a</em><em>l</em><em>w</em><em>a</em><em>y</em><em>s</em><em>.</em>
Therefore, Darrin's inference is wrong or invalid.
Answer:
31q+15
Step-by-step explanation:
The outlier (61) is at the low end of the data set, but doesn't affect the mean by a lot, so ...
The mean is centered among the other numbers in both sets of data.
_____
The mean without the outlier is 114. With the outlier, it is 107.4. The lower quartile is 108, so the mean does get moved outside the "box" of the box-and-whisker plot of the data set without the outlier.
Step-by-step explanation:
I don't know if the first set of numbers is all in one set, but I'll do my best to give you an answer.
Really all you need to do is use PEMDAS for the first question.
(Parentheses, exponents, multiply, divide, add, subtract. In that order)
Then to simplify that fraction next to it, notice that 0.018 is 3x 0.06.
that's a 3:1 ratio, so it ends up simplifying to this:
Lastly, to solve the division of that fraction. If you divide by a fraction, you multiply whatever it's dividing by its inverse.
So...
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
- (3⁴)⁻² * (3⁵)³ =
- 3⁴⁽⁻²⁾*3⁵⁽³⁾ =
- 3⁻⁸*3¹⁵ =
- 3⁻⁸⁺¹⁵ =
- 3⁷
Correct option is B. 3⁷
