Answer:
Hi
It meant a political situation among the states in which none of them achieved a power superior to the others. It is an idea of the late Middle Ages, applied to major or minor geographic regions that comprise the plurality of sovereign territories. Throughout Europe there is a legitimate feeling, always subject to interpretation, whereby any action required the confirmation of the rest of the States, the most significant case being the invasion of a territory. In this way the doctrine of just war was reached, to the problem of to what extent and to what extent the actual or imminent engraving of a State could mean a warlike justification. Transactions between contestants, neutral or rival, never ended, hence the relevance of diplomacy, as the concepts of balance, neutrality, freedom of Europe or sovereignty are interpreted continuously, while being used in conversations. Some thought of equilibrium as a natural system, because it was a consequence of international relations, and when a great power had too much force it threatened the others, and therefore, had to counteract the disproportion. Others considered it a desired goal for which he had fought.
In the rest of the world this balance of powers is characterized by the profusion of dictatorial or authoritarian regimes that have dominated the political scene and that have influenced the future of their peoples. A second point is the emergence of serious and bloody war conflicts, by territorial issues, which is not explained very well both in its unleashing and in its results, as consequences of the mere quantification of the powers faced. In all these, both in its gestation and its consequences, the role it plays in the character, personal ambitions and strategic conceptions of the leaders or rulers who govern the destinies of the countries involved appears with particular relevance.
Explanation:
Assume that skilled labor costs twice as much as unskilled labor, a profit maximizing firm will hire until the marginal product of unskilled labor is half that of skilled labor.
A profit maximizing firm is a firm that tries to create products that are of good quality at the barest or smallest cost.
The marginal product falls after an additional amount of the resource has been added. It is the extra amount that is gained due to the addition of an extra unit.
Due to the fact that both the skilled and unskilled would decrease eventually, the company would have to hire both at equal marginal products.
Read more on brainly.com/question/25706143
The dimensions of the cylinder can be used to minimise cost of manufacture.
<h3>How to we find minimised cost?</h3>
Let's ignore the metal's thickness and assume that the material cost to manufacture is precisely proportionate to the surface area of a perfect cylinder.
A=2πr(r+h)
Given that V=1000=r2h and h=1000=r2, we can write
A=2πr(r+1000πr2)
A=2πr2+2000r−1
By setting the derivative to zero, we may determine the value of r that minimises A:
A′=4πr−2000r−2
0=4πr−2000r−2
2000r−2=4πr
2000=4πr3
r=500π−−−√3
r=5.419 + cm
h=1000πr2=10.838 + cm
The can with the smallest surface area has a volume of 1000 cm 3 and measures 5.419+ cm in radius and 10.838+ cm in height. The can has a surface area of 553.58 cm 2. Given a constant volume, the cylinder with diameter equal to height has the least surface area.
Can surface area (cm2) versus. radius (cm), where capacity = 1000cm 3.
Learn more about manufacturing here:
brainly.com/question/17111259
#SPJ4
Answer:
The correct answer to the following question will be Option C.
Explanation:
- Constant cost industries seem to be a sector wherein the proportion of units produced as well as manufacturing costs every unit maintains the very same irrespective including its amount of manufacturing or rise in population. Which doesn't use input data in the appropriate amount to influence the rates of that same components by a shift in industry revenue.
- This doesn't even use inputs in such amounts that perhaps the costs of that same inputs will be influenced by a change in business production.
The other choices are not linked to an industry of this kind. Therefore the clarification above is correct.
Answer:
There is not gain in this operation so the answer is $0
Explanation:
There are some journal entries that needs to be done to have a full picture of the statement
* Purchase
Fixed Assets 690.000
Cash 690.000
* Monthly depreciation
Since, the FA was depreciated during 8 years. Firstly you have to calculate the amount that can be depreciate on a monthly basis
Amount to be depreciated = (Cost of the FA - Salvage value) = (690.000-48.600) = 641.400
Then calculate the yearly depreciation
Yearly depreciation = ((amount to be depreciated/useful life) * years used) =
(641.400/10*8) = 513.120
then the journal entry to record the monthly depreciation for 8 years is
Depreciation expense 513.120
Acc Depreciation 513.120
* Post the Journal Entry to record the sell of FA
You have to reverse the Acc Depreciation and credit the FA
Cash 152.500
Fixed assets 690.000
Acc depreciation 513.120
Loss on sale of FA 24.380
