The statement is partially correct, the laws would be extreme in numbers and there would be far more punishments than a state with a moderate amount of laws. There would be more laws or regulations broken or violated when it would regard certain things. But the number of laws however does not exactly show how corrupt the state may be, but how extensive or extreme the punishments for the crime would be.
The fate of a criminal is decided when the trial ends.
<u>A trial is held to decide if the person accussed of committing a crime will be punished or not</u>. In the system of common law, the defendant has the right to be tried before a jury, which is conformed by 12 people. In these cases,<u> the jury is the one in charge of giving a veredict, that is to say the jury is in charge of deciding the fate of a criminal</u> after examining the evidence provided by the lawyers.
Answer:
Robin Hood! Or Robin of Locksley, if you want to get technical.
