Answer:
well so far from what i understand is that the person who is speaking, most likely fought in the war of vietnam, and hated how cold the weather was in cleavland
Popular stories in Buddhism with a moral lesson involving animals or people are<u> Jataka tales</u>.
Because it provides insight into how Buddhists view their relationship to the natural world, general Buddhist humanitarian concerns, and the connection between Buddhist theory and Buddhist practice, the position and treatment of animals in Buddhism is significant. Animals regularly feature as supporting or starring characters in the Jataka stories, which describe the Buddha's previous lives in the form of folktales. It is also typical for the Bodhisattva (the Buddha's previous existence) to appear as an animal.
In the latter examples, where there are disputes between humans and animals, the animals frequently display traits of kindness and generosity that are lacking in the human characters. The stories sometimes feature animals alone and other times have animals in conflict with humans. The Jatakas also describe how Shakyamuni gave his life to save a dove from a hawk in a previous life as King Shibi. The Golden Light Sutra describes how Shakyamuni, then known as Prince Sattva, came upon a starving tigress and her pups in a previous incarnation and fed himself to them so they would survive.
Hence, option A is the correct answer
To learn more about Buddhism here,
brainly.com/question/5195813
#SPJ4
<span>The difference is that
"traditional stories always have a clear beginning".</span>
Storytelling portrays the social and social activity of sharing stories,
once in a while with exaggerations, showy behavior, or frivolity. Each culture
has its own stories or accounts, which are shared as a method for stimulation,
instruction, social protection or imparting moral esteems.
Answer:
The courts will likely exclude the evidence from court.
Explanation:
Exclusionary rule can be defined as rule which are legal, in which evidence collected without the warrant and consent from the owner can't be used against the owner in a court of law which is why police officers are been warned from abusing the constitutional rights because the rule are based on constitutional law which has to be adhere to .
Therefore the courts will likely exclude the evidence from court because the police officer conducts an illegal search of the trunk without a warrant or consent from the owner or operator.
Answer:
C. There is a danger in men getting too close to the ways of the gods.
