Step-by-step explanation:
I'm not sure if I got the correct answer since English is not my first language
Answer:
D. There is not convincing evidence of a relationship between annual company profit and median annual salary paid by the company.
Step-by-step explanation:
In this hypothesis test, the null hypothesis usually states that there is no relationship between the two variables in study.
In opposite, the claim that is being tested is the speculative hypothesis: that there is a significant relationship between both variables.
The researcher takes a sample and the P-value indicates the probability of getting that sample by pure chance <em>if the null hypothesis is true</em>.
Then, a very small P-value, below the significance level, indicates that the sample is very unusual if the null hypothesis is true, what gives evidence to reject the null hypothesis.
In this case, a P-value of 0.56 indicates that the sample is not unusual if the null hypothesis is true, so it gives no support to the claim that the null hypothesis is false and that there exists a relationship between the two variables in study.
Answer:
24
Step-by-step explanation:
4 years ago, Daniel would've been 4 and Kevin would be 20, so Kevin would've been 5 times as old as Daniel. And 8 x 3 = 24. So, Kevin is 24.
Answer:
You would have 1/6 of your money remaining.
Step-by-step explanation:
Let's write an equation for this.
1 - (2/3 + 1/6)
First, let's multiply the numerator and denominator of 2/3. You get 4/6!
1 - (2/3 + 1/6)
1 - (4/6 + 1/6)
Next, let's add 4/6 and 1/6. You get 5/6!
1 - (4/6 + 1/6)
1 - 5/6
Finally, let's turn 1 into 6/6 and do 6/6 - 5/6!
1 - 5/6
6/6 - 5/6
1/6
You would have 1/6 of your money remaining.
