The correct answer is that the limitation of this field study "determining direction of causality would be difficult because data are correlation & so many factors affect real life situations, it would be hard to control all the variables that creates findings harder to interpret."
In the given situation, because of the many factors present in the study and it affects real life situations, which are uncontrollable, which is why this study has this kind of limitation.
This is an example of Negligence
<u>Explanation:</u>
Negligence illustrates a circumstance in which a personality behaves in a negligent way, which ends in some other seizing injury or assets being broken. A failure to perform with the level of attention that someone of common concern would have applied to support the equivalent incidents.
The performance ordinarily consists of activities, but can also consist of needs when there is remarkable work to play. In a negligence suit, the person who brings a case needs to prove that the respondent was at responsibility for his or her damage.
Answer:
The fallacy found in the argument is:
e. slippery slope.
Explanation:
A fallacy is a flawed way of reasoning that ends up invalidating an argument. In the paragraph we are analyzing here, the type of fallacy used is called slippery slope.
Slippery slope is a reasoning that, from little evidence, develops a whole sequence of events that get more and more serious. It often ends with a catastrophic consequence. In this case, the speaker goes from a child wanting a slingshot to that child, in the future, owning several different types of heavy weapons.
Answer:
a. son of liberty
Explanation:
The Sons of Liberty were a group of colonial merchants and tradesmen founded to protest the Stamp Act and other forms of taxation. The group of revolutionists included prominent patriots such as Benedict Arnold, Patrick Henry and Paul Revere, as well as Adams and Hancock.
