Answer:
There was too much land for one king/queen to rule alone.
Answer: b)Change blindness
Explanation:
Change blindness is defined as situation where alteration in visual stimulus takes place but gets unnoticed by the observer. Change blindness usually occurs in situation where visual rapidly flickers, attention of observer is moved etc.This causes distraction is careful observation of person.
According to the question,if a person fails to notice shorter length of sideburns because switching of focus from one man to another caused distraction in attention .Thus, it is a case of change blindness.
Other options are incorrect because face recognition, component oriented recognition and bottom-up process is not depicted through question's scenario.Thus, the correct option is option(b).
Social stratification gives some people more privileges and opportunities than the others
In social stratification perspective , the society ranks their people into some sort of hierarchy.
Using this perspective, it's clear to see that someone who was born in higher status have more opportunities than the others ( for example someone can easily inherited a company from his parents while other have to build it from the ground)
Explanation:
Media and t.v stars are the role model of the public. The public has faith and belief in Movie and TV stars. When people watch violence on tv and videos, it affects them personally because their ideal star is performing that act. But this relation does not show that watching violence is related to aggressive behavior. OTV, video, and media play a role model for the public.
If the public watch violence on tv or media they get influenced more than directly watching aggression. This it is not necessary that watching violence influences the aggressive behavior of people because of media.
Answer: Senator Stephen A. Douglas of Illinois and President Franklin Pierce.
Context/details:
The Kansas-Nebraska Act enacted by Congress in 1854. It granted popular sovereignty to the people in the Kansas and Nebraska territories, letting them decide whether they'd allow slavery. In essence, this made the Kansas-Nebraska act a repeal of the Missouri Compromise of 1820, which had said there would be no slavery north of latitude 36°30´ except for Missouri.
After the passage of the Kansas-Nebraska Act, pro-slavery and anti-slavery settlers rushed into Kansas to try to sway the outcome of the issue, and violence between the two sides occurred. The term "bleeding Kansas" was used because of the bloodshed.
