The answer is <span>The supreme court is most likely to consider reviewing a case if </span><span>it raises a constitutional question
hope it helped </span>°ω°
An electorate (electoral college in modern terms) Each state shall appoint, in such manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a number of electors, equal to the whole number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress: but no Senator or Representative, or person holding an office of trust or profit under the United States, shall be appointed an elector.
Answer: He would avoid it because of sexual diversity.
Explanation: Sexual orientation is a complicated topic, there are lots of different sexual diversities. In this case he would avoid that question because it might offend someone who identifies themselve as queer, asexual, non-binery, transexual, etc. He may be asking 'what is your sexual orientation?' to avoid leaving behind some identities of the sexual spectrum.
I think the best way to overcome imagined risks is to just
go with it. At best, you should focus on the benefits of what you are about to
do. Thinking of the risks would only
make you hesitate. If it is worth it,
then go for it.
